I had a pour of this last evening during a tasting facilitated by Craigellechie. This was a piece of the lottery for the 51 yr old tasting which 150 individuals around the globe got an opportunity to attempt. Luckily @Scott_E was one of them and Im appreciative I was his visitor for the occasion. So...at the time I truly preferred this one. It was a progressively refined smoother variant of the 13. Kind of Puncture Brosnans Bond rather than Daniel Craigs unpleasant and tough one. All things considered however I incline toward the 13 for that harsh edge. To me its consistently ordinary to discover smooth adjusted single malts however such a great amount of harder to discover harsh and truly even ones. That being said...this was damn acceptable. The substantial notes were less articulated versus the 13 the sulfurous edges streamlined a piece. Im happy I tasted this yet Ill be a purchaser of the 13 only for that roughness.

Distiller gave this articulation one more point than the 23. So did a couple of individuals in the remark area on MofM. All things considered i'm apprehensive I need to vary here. Alright this 17yo is acceptable unique not the same as different malts around and for this situation an extraordinary jug to go after when searching for a simple sipper yet not the slightest bit might i be able to contrast it with the ground-breaking 23 where everything is fruitier juicier increasingly intricate well better...much better imho. still I give this one a strong 4